Small aperture vs big aperture7/4/2023 ![]() Other landscape scenes, however, are not likely to be so vast. A wide angle scene with giant rocks in the foreground, a beautiful lake in the middle ground, and majestic mountains in the background may very well require a narrow aperture like f/22 in order to extend the depth of field across the entire scene. Available for purchase.į/8 and F/11 work well for landscape scenes where there is not a significant distance between the foreground, middle ground, and background. The relatively quick shutter speed allowed me to handhold the shot without worrying about camera shake, and the f/9 aperture gave me a wide enough depth of field (area in focus) to capture both the foreground and background.Ĭlouds over Mammoth Hot Springs by Archaeofrog. This image above, of floating ice in Lake Superior, was shot at f/9, 1/200th of a second, and ISO 100. These 'who cares' apertures can be used successfully for landscape photography when the sharp precision of f/22 is not required. Ice Flows on Lake Superior by Archaeofrog on Flickr If you often shoot on program or auto mode on your camera, you may notice that you camera tends to 'suggest' these values often, particularly if you are shooting outside on a sunny day. If you are not looking to do something specific that requires a wide or a narrow aperture, then you should feel fairly confident selecting one of these aperture values for your shot.į/8 and F/11 are the work horse apertures. They provide a middle option to balance a reasonably wide depth of field with a reasonable shutter speed. These two apertures, f/8 and f/11, are essentially the 'Goldilocks' of aperture values: not too hot, not too cold, but just right. The descriptions are geared towards beginning photographers looking to advance, and I found it a very helpful guide when starting out.Ĭomparison of the three aperture divisions: f/1.8, f/11, and f/22.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |